What is two-party consent?

In some jurisdictions, every participant on a call has to agree before it can be recorded, not only the business making the call.

An admin approves every new account by hand. Nothing is created until then. We reply by email; no newsletter, no sequence.

app.salescrew.io/inbox
The unified reply inbox with classified threads

Two-party consentTwo-party (all-party) consent is the rule, in some US states and other jurisdictions, that every participant must agree before a call is recorded. A business that records calls has to announce it where the stricter rule applies.

Also known as: all-party consent

Why it matters

Call recording laws are not uniform. Some jurisdictions follow one-party consent, meaning only one person on the call, often the business doing the recording, needs to agree. Others follow two-party, or all-party, consent, where every single participant on the call has to agree before recording is legal, not only the party initiating it. A business operating on the assumption that its own consent is enough can be recording calls illegally without realising it.

The detail that trips businesses up is which jurisdiction's rule actually applies. It's not simply where the business is located: it follows the caller's location too, so a call to someone in a two-party consent jurisdiction can require disclosure even if the business itself sits somewhere with a one-party rule. A blanket recording disclosure at the start of every call is the practical way most businesses handle this, rather than trying to determine each caller's location in real time.

What compliant call recording generally requires

  1. 1

    Determine which rule could apply

    Consider both the business's jurisdiction and the caller's, since the stricter one governs.

  2. 2

    Disclose recording upfront

    A clear announcement at the start of the call, before any substantive conversation.

  3. 3

    Give the caller a way to object

    Some approaches allow continuing the call to imply consent; others require an explicit opt-out path.

  4. 4

    Keep the disclosure consistent

    Applied on every call, not selectively, since the caller's location isn't always known in advance.

The mistake to watch for

Announcing recording only where the business is located. The rule follows the caller's location too. This is not legal advice.

Questions

What is the difference between one-party and two-party consent?
One-party consent means only one person on the call needs to agree to recording, typically satisfied by the business itself. Two-party, or all-party, consent requires every participant on the call to agree, which means the business alone agreeing is not enough where this rule applies.
Whose location determines which consent rule applies?
It can be either party's, which is exactly what makes this tricky: a call can be subject to a stricter rule based on where the other participant is located, not only where the business itself operates. This is not legal advice, and the applicable rule for a specific call is worth confirming directly.
Does announcing 'this call may be recorded' satisfy two-party consent?
A clear disclosure at the start of the call is the common practical approach, but whether it legally satisfies consent requirements depends on the specific jurisdiction and how the disclosure is delivered. This is not legal advice.